Two Attitudes Towards the History of Philosophy:
The Cartesian-Husserlian and the Hegelian Approach
 
Professor LAU Chong-fuk
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
 
The relation of philosophy to its history is ambivalent. On the one hand, there is hardly any other academic discipline which attaches greater importance to the study of its history than philosophy, but on the other, philosophy does not seem to be able to rely on what past thinkers have achieved. Philosophers often struggle between a radical new beginning and a never-ending return to the past, a conflict which is rooted in two apparently incompatible demands of philosophy: the notion of philosophy as a rigorous science and the historical character of philosophy. This paper begins with a sketch of the Cartesian-Husserlian approach, discussing the possibility of establishing a ˇ§first philosophyˇ¨ without any presuppositions. It then proceeds to explain Hegelˇ¦s criticisms of this approach. The last part of the paper attempts to show how the scientific and the historical character of philosophy are unified in Hegelˇ¦s system.